All Forms & Files - Lower Rio Grande Adjudication

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Exhibits to the Response to the 8-27-15 US’ Motion in Limine; 8-28-15

New Mexico State University’s Response to Certain Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Request to Set Stream Issue to Adjudicate Pre-1906 Rights; 10-5-12

EBIDS Response to US’ Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings in Stream System Issue 104; 10-13-11

US Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings in Stream System Issue No. 104; 9-26-11

ORDER REGARDING APPEAL #33968; 9-29-14

State of New Mexico’s Notice of Supplemental Authority; 10-4-13

EPNG’s Notice of Joinder in NMSU and City of Las Cruces’ Response Opposing the US’ Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings; 10-13-11

NMPGs Response to US’ Motion to Continue Stay of Proceedings in Stream System Issue No. 104; 10-13-11

Notice of Withdrawal by Counsel (Victor R. Marshall); 10-10-14

ORDER ON NEXT ISSUES AND SCHEDULE FOR LITIGATION REGARDING THE US’ RIO GRANDE PROJECT; 10-12-12

City of El Paso’s Joinder in NMSU’s Response to Certain Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Request to Set Stream System Issue to Adjudicate Pre-1960 Rights; 10-5-12

SRGDCFA’S and NMPGs Joint Response to Request for Statement of Issue Regarding the US’ Rights in the Rio Grande Project and the Sammie Singh, Sr.,et al’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Pre-1906 Claims; 10-5-12

The Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedings in SSI-104; 10-9-15

Amended Certificate of Service; 9-25-14

City of El Pasos Joinder in US Motion to Continue Stay of Proceedings; 9-27-11

ORDER – MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD GRANTED; 9-28-10

Entry of Appearance; 9-29-15

ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE IN STREAM SYSTEM ISSUE 104; 9-22-11

SNMs Comments on the Claims of the United States Derived from the Rio Grande Project; 9-15-10

City of Las Cruces’ Comments on Other Parties’ Statements Regarding SS No. 97-104; 9-24-10

Verdes Response to the US Statement of Claim for Water for the Rio Grande Project; 9-24-10

Designation of Records for Supplement (Lions Gate Water); 9-28-10

Lions’s Gate Water’s Motion to Supplement the Court Record and Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief-in-Chief; 9-28-10

Additional Designation of Records for Supplement; 9-29-10

Notice of Hearing (set 10-24-13 @ 9:00); 9-20-13

Statement of EPCWID No. 1 Regarding the US Statement of Claim for the Rio Grande Project; 9-15-10

United States Statement of Claim for Water for the Rio Grande Project; 9-15-10

NMSUs Comments Regarding US Statement of Claim for Water for the Rio Grande Project; 9-24-10

Submission in Response to United States Statement of Claim; 9-24-10

Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conference and Status Conferences; 9-13-16

US Response to Parties Statements on Issues in Stream System Issue No. 4; 9-17-10

EBID Response to Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 9-16-16

Notice of Non-Availability – Davidson, Tessa; 9-21-16

SNMs Response to Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants Motion to Stay Further Proceeding in SS-97-104; 9-2-14

Joint Response to Request for Statement of the Issues Regarding the US’ Rio Grande Project; 9-21-12

SRGDCFA Response to the US Motion to Clarify and Extend Deadline in Stream System Issue No. 104; 9-16-11

Response of EPCWID No. 1 to Parties Statement of Interests in Stream System Issue No. 104; 9-15-10

Certificate of Service (SNM’s 1st Set of Interrogatories); 9-11-14

Motion to Clarify and Extend Deadline in Stream System Issue No. 4 (US); 9-12-11

Order Granting in part the United States’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Trial Evidence and Arguments that are Irrelevant and-or More Properly Relate to Issues Set for Hearing in Separate Proceedings; 9-4-15

SRGDCF Notice of Joinder with Stahmanns, NMSU, City of Las Cruces and NMPG in the Joint Motion for Order Lifting Stay of Stream System Issue No. 104; 9-9-11

Statement on Stream System Issues by MSPM Associates LP; 9-9-10

Correspondence dated 9-5-15; 9-8-15

SNM’s Response to Certain Pre-1906 Claimants Motion for Summary Judgment and Request to Set Stream System Issue to Adjudicate Pre-1906 Rights; 9-6-12

AMENDED SCHEDULE ORDER FOR MOTIONS RE: SS-97-104 – US INTEREST; 9-9-10

Motion for Leave to Participate in Stream System 104 (MSPM); 9-9-10

Notice of Service List and Instructions for Attorneys for Updating the Service List; 9-9-10

Notice of Service List and Instructions for Pro Se Parties for Updating the Service List; 9-9-10

CLC and EBID’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion for Summary Judgment and Request to Set Stream Issue to Adjudicate Pre-1906 Rights Submitted by Sammie Singh Sr., et al; 9-5-12

Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Request for Statement of the Issues Regarding the US’ Rio Grande Project; 9-5-12

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REQUEST TO SET STREAM ISSUE TO ADJUDICATE PRE-1906 RIGHTS; 9-6-12

ORDER GRANTING THE US’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; 9-6-12

SNM’s Separate Report Stating Issues that can Next be Addressed in Stream System Issue SS-97-104; 9-5-12

NMSU’s Claim of Interest and Legal Position Regarding Stream System Issue No. 104; 8-30-10

Statement of Claims of Interest in Stream System Issue No. 104 (Triple A Farms, LLC, et.al.); 8-30-10

Statement on Stream System Issues by MSPM Associates LP; 8-30-10

Verde’s Statement of Interest and Legal Position; 8-30-10

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE NOTICE OF INTENT TO PARTICIPATE IN STREAM SYSTEM ISSUE NO. 104 (Triple A Farms); 9-1-10

ORDER ALLOWING FILING OF LATE NOTICE OF INTENT TO PARTCIPATE; 9-2-10

Notice of Change of Law Firm and Address; 8-29-16

Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support; 8-29-16

City of El Paso’s Claim of Interest and Legal Position; 8-30-10

City of Las Cruces’ Statement of Interest in Stream System Issue No. 104; 8-30-10

Claims of Interest and Position Regarding Stream System Issue SS-97-104 (Boyd, et.al); 8-30-10

Motion for Leave to File Notice of Intent to Participate in Stream System Issue No. 104; 8-30-10

Stahmanns Inc’s Claims of Interest; 8-30-10

Certificate of Service; 8-29-16

City of Las Cruces’ Reply to Responses Filed in Opposition to the City’s Motion For Partial Summary Judgment that the US is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date; 7-30-15

US’ Motion in Limine to Exclude Trial Evidence and Arguments that are Irrelevant and More Properly Relate to Issues Set for Hearing in Separate Proceedings; 8-27-15

Order Commencing Expedited inter se Proceeding to Determine the Claims of the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Designated Representatives to Ownership of Rights Derivative of the Rio Grande Dam and Irrigation Company and Setting a Scheduling Order; 8-28-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the US’ Motion in Limine; 8-28-15

SNM’s Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to EBIDs Reply in Opposition to the States Reponse to US MSJ and SurReply; 8-20-13

Subfile Offer of Judgment to Settle the United States of Americas Rio Grande Project Rights; 8-29-11

Final Pretrial Order; 8-28-15

Memorandum Opinion and Order Addressing Pretrial Motions in SS-97-104; 8-20-15

SNM and CLC’ Response in Partial Support of the US’ Motion in Limine; 8-27-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Reply in Support of Their Motion Requesting Designation of an Expedited inter se Proceeding; 8-10-15

Notice of Filing Docketing Statement (Pre-1906 Claimants by Robert Simon) Docketing Statement attached-118 pgs total (RE Order of June 18 2014); 8-11-14

NMPG’s Supplemental Final Trial and Demonstrative Exhibits List; 8-25-15

Letter from Honorable James J. Wechsler dated August 27, 2015 = regarding Opening Statements; 8-27-15

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO FILE ADDITIONAL PLEADINGS; 8-22-13

Order Granting the State of New Mexico and City of Las Cruces’ June 29, 2015 Motion to Exclude Evidence; 8-18-15

Request for Statement of Issues Regarding the United States’ Rio Grande Project; 8-16-12

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment; 8-22-12

Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Pre 1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 8-22-12

Motion for Summary Judgment and Request to Set Stream Issue to Adjudicate Pre-1906 Rights; 8-22-12

SNM’s Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply to the City El Paso’s Reply to the SNMs Response in Opp to US MSJ; 8-20-13

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE; 8-20-12

Letter dated 08-17-15 from Honorable James J. Wechsler regarding three summary judgment motions filed on June 29, 2015; 8-18-15

Notice of Errata to SNM’s Certificate of Provenance of Exhibits to its filings in Summary Judgment Proceeding on the Amounts of Water and Priority Date(s) for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right; 8-13-13

Stipulation Regarding Authenticity and Admissibility of Exhibit Documents; 8-16-13

SNM’s Reply to NMPGs and SRGDCF’s Responses to its MSJ on the Amounts of Water and Priority Dates for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right; 8-5-13

US Consolidated Reply to Responses filed to Motions in Support of Summary Judgment; 8-5-13

Order Granting the State’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater and Denying the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 8-16-12

Notice of Filing Motion to Limit Record Proper in Appeal of June18, 2014 Order; 8-12-14

Notice of Filing Motion to Limit Record Proper in Appeal No. 33,672 in the New Mexico Court of Appeals; 8-12-14

Pre-1906 Representative Claimants’ Proposed Scheduling Order; 8-10-15

State of New Mexico’s Proposed Scheduling Order for Expedited inter se Proceedings; 8-7-15

Order Taking Under Advisement Request to Lift Stay on Amicus Status for Lion’s Gate Water; 8-11-10

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Proposed Pre-trial Statements; 8-3-15

EBID’s Response in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion Requesting Designation of Expedited inter se Proceeding and Statement of Rights of the Pre-1906 Representative Claimants; 8-6-15

SNM’s Certification of Provenance of Exhibits to its Filings in Summary Judgment Proceeding on the Amounts of Water and Priority Date(s) for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right; 8-6-13

Reply of the SNM and the City of Las Cruces to the US’ Response in Opposition to the State of New Mexico and the City of Las Cruces’ Memorandum in Support and Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the US’ Rio Grande Project; 7-30-15

SNM’s Reply to City of El Paso’s Combined Response to the MSJ on Project Priority and Amnt; 8-5-13

SNM’s Reply to EBID’s Response to All Pending Motions for Summary Judgment; 8-5-13

US’ Supplement to its Motion and Memorandum for Summary Judgment; Affidavit of Andrew Gahan; 8-5-13

SNM’s Reply to US Consolidated Response in Opposition to the SNM’s and the CLC’ Motions and Memoranda in Support of Summary Judgment; 8-5-13

Pre-1906 Claimants Consolidated Reply to the US, OSE, CLC, EBID, NMSU, EPCWD1 and Verde Group’s Response to the US, Las Cruces, OSE and the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motions for Summary Judgmetn Regarding the US’ Claims in SSI-104 in the LRGA; 8-5-13

City of Las Cruces Reply to the US Consolidated Response in Opposition to the SNM and CLC Motions and Memoranda in Support of Summary Judgment; 8-5-13

Reply of SNM and the CLC to the Pre-1906 Claimants Response to the Mtns for SJ of US, State, LC; 8-5-13

City of Las Cruces Reply to City of El Pasos Combined Response to Motions for Summary Judgment on Project Priority and Amount; 8-5-13

EBIDs Mtn for Leave to Reply and Reply State of New Mexicos Response Regarding Motions for Summary Judgment; 8-5-13

City of El Paso’s Motion for Leave to Reply and Reply to SNM’s Response in Opposition to US MSJ; 8-5-13

US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 6-29-15

Proposed Pretrial Statements of SNM and CLC; 8-3-15

City of Las Cruces Consolidated Reply to New Mexico Pecan Growers Response to City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Summary Judgment and EBID’s Response to All Pending Motions Regarding Summary Judgment; 8-5-13

Addendum to Response in Opposition of the SNM and CLC to the US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; 7-27-15

SCHEDULING ORDER FOR MOTIONS SS-97-104 UNITED STATES INTERESTS; 8-4-10

Motion to Amend Record Proper (COA #33,672); 7-31-14

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Notice of Filing Motion to Amend Record Proper in COA #33,672; 7-31-14

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Filing of Errata to their Motion to Set an inter se Proceeding to Examine the Claims of Pre-1906 Claimants to Project, Diversion and Storage Rights; 7-30-15

United States’ Reply to the State of New Mexico and the City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to the United States’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; 7-30-15

Order Denying the State of New Mexico’s Motion to Preclude Additional Brief from EP#1; 7-31-12

Order Denying the State of New Mexico’s Motion to Preclude Reply from the City of El Paso; 7-31-12

Reply of New Mexico and Las Cruces to the Responses of EBID, the United States, and Others, to the Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 7-30-15

SRGDCFA’ Response to the SNM and CLC’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 7-23-15

Schedule of Hearings Regarding Pretrial Motions; 7-29-15

City of Las Cruces 2nd half of Exhibits to the MSJ; 6-29-15

City of El Paso’s Response in Opposition to the City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the US is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date; 7-29-15

Notice of Hearing Regarding Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Designate Expedited Inter Se Proceedings; 7-29-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the SNM and CLC’ Motion to Exclude Evidence from Record and Summary Judgments and the US Summary Judgment on Priority Dates of the Federal Project; 7-21-15

United States’ Response in Opposition to the City of Las Cruces’ Motino for Partial Summary Judgment that the US is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date; 7-21-15

EBID’s Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel and Designation of Counsel; 7-25-14

State of New Mexico’s Response in Opposition to Motion to Designate Expedited Inter Se; 7-16-15

SRGDCFA’s Response in Opposition to the CLC’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the US is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project and Brief in Support; 7-23-15

SRGDCFA’s Response in Opposition to the Renewed Motion of the SNM and CLC for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right and Memorandum in Support; 7-23-15

Notice of Pre-Trial Conference (Amended); 7-24-14

EBID’s Response to SNM and CLC’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 7-21-15

US’ Response in Opposition to the SNM and the CLC’ Memorandum in Support and Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the US’ Rio Grande Project; 7-21-15

US’ Response in Opposition to the SNM and CLC’ Joint Motion and Memorandum in Support to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 7-21-15

Response in Opposition of the SNM and the CLC of the US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; 7-21-15

NMPG’s Response in Opposition to the City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the US’ is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project and Brief in Support; 7-21-15

NMPG’s Response in Opposition to the Renewed Motion of the SNM and CLC for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right and Memorandum in Support; 7-21-15

NMPG’s Response to SNM and CLC’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 7-21-15

EBID’s Response to Renewed Motion of the SNM and CLC for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the US’ Rio Grande Project; 7-21-15

United States’ Consolidated Reply to Responses to the US Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-13-12

EBID’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 7-17-15

Notice of Interim Pre-trial Conference and Motion Hearing; 7-17-15

SRGDCFA’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 7-17-15

EBID’s Objection to Pre-1906 Claimants’, SNM, and City of Las Cruces’ Exhibit Lists; 7-10-15

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response and Reply Briefs to all Pre-trial Motions in Stream System Issue No. 104; 7-14-15

NMPG’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 7-16-15

United States’ Objections to the SNM, CLC, and Pre-1906 Claimants’ Exhibit Lists and Expert Reports; 7-10-15

State of New Mexico’s Consolidated Reply to US’ Response to teh SNM’s Motion to DIsmiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project Right and to City of El Paso’s Response to Motions to Dismiss; 7-13-12

State of New Mexico’s Reply to EBID’s Response to Dispositive Motions Regarding the Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project; 7-13-12

NMSU’ Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss the US’ Ownership Claims to Groundwater; 7-13-12

Motion to Preclude Additional Brief from EP#1 on the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (filed by SNM); 7-10-12

Verde’s Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project Right; 7-12-12

NMPG’s Reply to the US’ and EBID’s Responses to NMPG’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claim to Groundwater Rights in the Lower Rio Grande; 7-13-12

State of New Mexico’s Motion to Strike Response of Certain Pre-1906 Claimants to US Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-13-12

City of El Paso’s Response in Opposition to State’s Motion to Preclude Reply Brief from City of El Paso on United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-13-12

City of Las Cruces’ Consolidated Reply to Responses to the City of Las Cruces’ Motion to Dismiss and Limit Claims of the United States; 7-13-12

City of El Paso’s Reply in Support of United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-13-12

Objections of the SNM and the CLC to the Proposed Exhibit and Witness Lists of the Participating Parties in SSI 104, US Priority Date; 7-10-15

City of Las Cruces’ Notice of Joinder in SNM’s Motion to Preclude Additional Brief from EP#1 on the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-11-12

City of El Paso’s Joinder in US’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 7-7-15

City of Las Cruces’ Notice of Joinder in SNM’s Motion to Preclude Reply Brief from City of EL Paso on the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 7-11-12

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel – Dempsey, Rebecca; 7-8-16

Clarified Objections of the SNM and the CLC to the Proposed Exhibit and Witness Lists of the Participating Parties in SSI 104, United States Priority Date; 7-10-15

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel (EBID-Lisa J. Henne); 7-9-15

SRGDCFA Amended Expert Witness List; 7-7-14

Motion to Preclude Reply Brief from City of El Paso on the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment (filed by SNM); 7-10-12

SNM and CLC Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 6-29-15

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response and Reply Briefs to All Pre-Trial Motions in Stream System Issue No. 104; 7-9-15

El Paso Natural Gas Company’s Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss United States’ Claims to Groundwater; 7-10-12

Statement of Rights of Pre-1906 Representative Claimants Pursuant to the Court’s June 1, 2015 Order; 6-30-15

NMPG’s Final Trial and Demonstrative Exhibits List; 6-26-15

Certificate of Costs from the County of Dona Ana in the State of New Mexico RE: Appeal 33672; 7-9-14

Certificate of Service RE: Record Proper Appeal 33672; 7-9-14

Amended Notice of Unavailability – Rebecca Dempsey; 7-8-16

The Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion Requesting Designationof Expedited Inter Se Proceeding to Address Representative Claimants’ Sub-Files; 6-30-15

Verdes Response to the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-21-12

Exhibits to the SNM and CLC Memo in support of Renewed Mtn for SJ; 6-29-15

SRGDCFA’s Final Trial and Demonstrative Exhibits List; 6-29-15

Memorandum Brief of the SNM and the City of Las Cruces in Support of Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the US’ Rio Grande Project Right; 6-29-15

SNM and City of Las Cruces’ Joint Motion to Exclude Evidence Unrelated to the US’ Interests in the Rio Grande Project; 6-29-15

Renewed Motion of the SNM and the CLC for Summary Judgment on the Priority Dates of the USâ?? Rio Grande Project Right; 6-29-15

City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the US is Estopped from Obtaining a Pre-1906 Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project and Brief in Support Thereof; 6-29-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the US’ Motion for Summar Judment and Motions to Dismiss Claims of the US by Verde Group, The Pecan Growers, Assn., the SRGCFA, NMSU, and City of Las Cruces; 6-21-12

State of New Mexico and City of Las Cruces Trial Exhibit List; 6-26-15

City of El Paso’s Final Trial Exhibit List; 6-26-15

EBID’s Final Trial Exhibit and Demonstrative Exhibit List; 6-26-15

United States’ List of Trial Exhibits; 6-26-15

United States’ Consolidated Response to Motions to Dismiss; 6-21-12

Defendants’ Pre-1906 Claimants’ Trial Exhibit List; 6-24-15

NMPG’s Response to the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 6-21-12

Order on US’ Motion for Extension of the Deadline for Filing Pre-Trial Motions; 6-22-15

EBID’s Notice of Errata (correct its June 21, 2012 filing); 6-26-12

SRGDCFA’s Response to Sammie Singh, Sr., et. al’s Motion to Dismiss all Claims by the U.S.; 6-21-12

EPNG’s Response to US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-22-12

Scheduling Report (by SNM); 6-24-11

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment

EBID’s Response to all Dispositive Motions Regarding the Source or Sources of Water for the Rio Grande Project; 6-21-12

Affidavit of Mark F. Sheridan in Support of EPNG’s Request for Rule 1-056(F) Relief; 6-22-12

Stahmanns Inc.’s Notice of Joinder in New Mexico Pecan Growers’ Response to the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 6-22-12

US’ Motion for Extension of the Deadline for Filing Pre-Trial Motions; 6-18-15

SNM’s Memorandum in Opposition to US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-21-12

SRGCFA’ Response to US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-21-12

NMSUs Response to the United States Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-21-12

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

City of El Paso’s Response to Motions to Dismiss; 6-21-12

El Paso County Water Improvement District No 1’s Brief in Support of the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 6-21-12

NMPG Response to Sammie Singh Sr., et al’s Motion to Dismiss all Claims by the US; 6-21-12

Order on EBID’s Motion for Extension of the Deadlines for Filing Final Trial Exhibit List and Demonstrative Exhibits; 6-19-15

Certificate of Service – SNM Responds to 3rd Set of Discovery; 6-3-15

Stahmann’s, NMSU’s, City of Las Cruces’ and NMPG’s Joint Reply to United States et al.’s Response to Joint Motion for Order Lifting Stay of Stream System Issue No. 104; 6-21-10

NOTICE OF HEARING; 6-9-16

ORDER ON US’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLIES TO RESPONSES TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS IN SS 104; 6-20-13

Order Denying Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings in Stream System Issue 104; 6-19-1497104

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Replies to Responses to Summary Judgment Motions in SS104; 6-19-13

EBID’s Motion for Extension of the Deadlines for Filing Final Trial Exhibit Lists and Demonstrative Exhibits; 6-17-15

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SS-97-104; 6-18-14

United States’ Disclosure and Identification of Expert Witness; 6-13-14

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert Witness List; 6-16-14

SRGDCFA’s Expert Witness List; 6-16-14

City of Las Cruces’ Expert Witness List; 6-13-14

EBID’s Disclosure and Identification of Expert Witness; 6-13-14

NMSU’s Expert Witness List; 6-13-14

SNM’s Expert Witness List; 6-13-14

Verde’s Response to United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Response to State of New Mexico’s Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

Jack F. and Jean M. Darbyshire Trust’s Response to All Pending Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding the Amounts of Water and the Priority Dates(s) for United States’ Rio Grande Project Ri; 6-11-13

United States’ Notice of Errata; 5-29-12

Response of US, EBID, and El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 to Motion for Order Lifting Stay of Stream System Issue NO. 104; 6-9-10

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Feburary 18, 2015 Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 6-1-15

NMPGs’ Response to the City of Las Cruces Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority and Amnt Water for United States’ Ro Grande Project; 5-24-13

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ February 28, 2015 Motion for Threshold Issue, and Establishing an Expedited Inter Se Proceeding on Representative Claims; 6-1-15

State of New Mexico’s Reply to United States’ Response to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-27-14

Consolidated Reply in Support of Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings (EP/EPCWID); 5-27-14

EPCWID #1’s Response to the United States Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

Corrected Notice of Renewed Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan; 5-28-15

State of New Mexico’s Reply to EBID’s Response to Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-27-14

EBID’s Response to All Pending Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding the Amounts of Water and the Priority Dates(s) for the Runited States’ Rio Grande Project Right; 5-24-13

US’ Consolidated Response in Opposition to the State of New Mexico’s and the CIty of Las Cruces’ Motions and Memoranda in Support of Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

US’ Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-18-12

NMPGs’ Response to the SNM’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Amounts of Water and Priority Dates for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right; 5-24-13

NMPGs’ Response to the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support; 5-24-13

NMSU’s Response to the United States Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Against the U.S. Claims Under SSI 104; 5-24-13

EPNG’s Response in Opposition to the United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-24-13

NMPGs’ Response to Pre-1906 Claimants Motion for Summary Judgment Against the US Claims Under SSI 104; 5-24-13

Pre-1906 Claiamnts’ Reply in Support of their Motion for Threshold Issue; 5-18-15

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to the US’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority Date and Amounts of Water for US’ Rio Grande Project Right and to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Against the United States Claims Under SSI No. 104; 5-24-13

EPCWID #1’s Response to the Pleading of Pre-1906 Claimants’ Miscaptioned as Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Summary Judgment Against the U.S. Claims Under SSI 104; 5-24-13

City of EL Paso’s Combined Response to the Motions for Summary Judgment on Project Priority and Amount; 5-24-13

EPCWID #1’s Response to State of New Mexico’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Amounts of Water and Priority Dates for the US’ Rio Grande Project Right; 5-24-13

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel (Rebecca Dempsey); 5-23-14

EPCWID #1’s Response to City of Las Cruces Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority Date & Amounts; 5-24-13

SRGDCFA Motion to Dismiss US’ Claim to Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 5-18-12

Notice of Renewed Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan; 5-21-15

Correspondence – Carolyn Adams; 5-22-15

SRGDCFA’s Response to Summary Judgment Motions of the Pre-1906 Claimants, United States, State of New Mexico and the City of Las Cruces; 5-23-13

Notice of Non-Availability (Reckard); 5-20-13

Joint Motion to Set Oral Argument; 5-18-16

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel-R. Lee Leininger; 5-19-16

Notice to the SNM for Deposition Duces Tecum of NMRA Rule 1-030(b)6) Designated Person; 5-19-15

United States’ Response to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-15-14

SNM’s Reply to the Responses of the US, EPCWID#1, and City of El Paso to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-18-15

Verde’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project Right; 5-18-12

Sammie Singh, Sr., Sammie Singh, Jr., Ed Provencio, Jonny Diaz, and John Fleming as Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Dismiss all Claims by the US; 5-18-12

SNM’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project Right; 5-18-12

SNMs Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss the US Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water for the Rio Grande Project; 5-18-12

United States’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-18-12

Verde Realty Operating Partnership, L.P., Verde Railroad Land LLC, Verde Intermodal Industrial Park, LLC, and Verde Border Industrial Park, LLC’s Response to the City of El Paso’s Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-15-14

Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of US’ Motion for Summary Judgment; 5-18-12

US, EBID, NMPG, SRGDCGA’ Joint Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 5-9-16

EPNG’s Motion to Dismiss States’ Claims to Groundwater as a Source of Water; 5-18-12

NMPG’s Motion to Dismiss the US’ Claim to Groundwater Rights in the Lower Rio Grande and its Brief in Support; 5-18-12

NMSU’s Memorandum Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss the US’ Ownership Claims to Groundwater; 5-18-12

NMSUs Motion to Dismiss the United States Claim to Ownership of Groundwater; 5-18-12

Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum; 5-15-15

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support; 5-15-14

City of Las Cruces’ Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Limit Claims of the US; 5-18-12

City of Las Cruces’ Motion to Dismiss and Limit Claims of the US; 5-18-12

Defendant EBID’s Response to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support; 5-15-14

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the U.S.’, The N.M. Office of State Engineer’s and City of Las Cruces’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding the U.S.’ Claims in SSI-104 in the LRGA; 5-17-13

US, EBID, NMPG and SRGDCGA’s Post-Trial Brief; 5-9-16

State of New Mexico’s Response in Opposition to Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-15-14

Stahmann’s, NMSU’s, City of Las Cruces’ and NMPG’s Joint Motion for Order Lifting Stay of Stream System Issue No. 104; 5-18-10

NMSU’s Response in Opposition to Joint Motion to Stay; 5-15-14

New Mexico Pecan Growers Response in Opposition to the Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-16-14

ORDER AMENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS REGARDING THE SOURCE OR SOURCES OF WATER FOR THE RIO GRANDE PROJECT; 5-17-12

Certificate of Service; 5-11-16

Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum; 5-14-15

United States’ Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-8-15

SRGDCFA’ Response in Opposition to the Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 5-14-14

Certificate of Service – Brief; 5-11-16

State of New Mexico’s Request for Oral Argument and Post-Trial Memorandum in Support of 1906, 1908 and 1939 as Priority Dates for the United States’ Rio Grande Project Right; 5-9-16

United States Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment; 4-24-13

City of Las Cruces’ Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-11-15

US’ Notice of Withdrawal of Motion; 5-11-15

State of New Mexico’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 5-9-16

Joint Motion of the US and SNM for Amended Schedule in Stream System Issue No. 104 and Request for Expedited Consideratione; 5-10-12

City of Las Cruces’ Post-Trial Brief in Support of 1906, 1908, and 1939 Priority Dates for the Rio Grande Project and Request for Oral Argument; 5-9-16

City of Las Cruces’ Requested Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 5-9-16

Response of Amicus Curiae EPCWID#1 in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-1-15

City of EL Paso and EPCWID1’s Brief in Support of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Relating to a Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project Right of the United States; 5-9-16

City of El Paso and EPCWID1’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Relating to a Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project Right of the US; 5-9-16

Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support (City of El Paso, with the support of EPCWID); 4-17-14

ORDER GRANTING EBID’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; 5-9-13

US Motion for One Week Extension of Filing Deadlines in Stream System Issue No. 104 Briefing and Request for Expedited Consideration; 5-9-12

City of El Paso’s Response in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel and Response in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue; 5-4-15

Order on US’ Motion for One Week Extension of Filing Responses on Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel in Stream System Issue No. 104; 5-4-15

EBIDs Motion for Extension of Time to File Responses to Summary Judgment Motions & Replies; 5-3-13

EPCWID #1’s Response to EBID’s Motion for Extension of Time; 5-8-13

SNM’s Response in Opposition to Defendant EBIDs Motion for Extension of Time to File Summary Judgment Motions & Replies; 5-7-13

City of Las Cruces Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority Date and Amounts of Water for United States’ Rio Grande Project Right; 4-19-13

US’ Motion for Continuance of Interim Pre-Trial Conference and Motion Hearing; 5-1-15

SNM’s Response to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-1-15

US’ Motion for Extension of the Deadlines for Filing Responses and Replies to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 5-1-15

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference and Motion Hearing; 4-28-15

Response of Amicus Curiae EPCWID#1 in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue; 5-1-15

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue; 5-1-15

EBID’ and the US’ Joint Response to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue; 5-1-15

City of Las Cruces Motion for Summary Judgment on Priority Date and Amounts of water for the United States’ Rio Grande Project Right; 4-29-13

Certificate of Service (SNM Responses to Pre-1906 Claimants Mtn Threshold/MtnJudicial Estoppel); 5-1-15

Notice of Service of US’ Third Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Prodeuction and Request for Admission to the SNM; 5-1-15

Notice of Service of US’ 3rd Set of Interrogatories, Requests for Production and Requests for Admission to the State of New Mexico; 5-1-15

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION OF THE CITY OF EL PASO and EL PASO COUNTY WATER IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1’S JOINT MOTION TO STAY; 4-30-14

Notice of Motion Hearing Re: Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay; 4-29-14

Order on US’ Motion for Extension of the Deadline to File Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Post-Trial Briefs; 4-28-16

Notice of Motion Hearing re: EP and EPCWID Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 4-29-14

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 4-26-16

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference set for May 29 2014 at 8:30 a.m.; 4-29-14

Motion for Extension of Time to Answer the City of El Paso’s and the El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1’s Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings; 4-29-14

State of New Mexico Rebuttal Witness List; 4-22-15

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference; 4-27-15

Certificate of Service (SNM’s 2nd Set of Discovery to Pre-1906 Claimants); 4-28-15

Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Proposed Finding of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Post-Trial Briefs; 4-27-16

Memorandum in Support of SNMs Motion for Summary Judgment on the Amounts of Water and Priority Dates for the United States’ Rio Grande Project; 4-19-13

United States Motion for Determination that the US Filing of Summary Judgment Pleading is Timely, or in the Alternative, Allowing the Late Filings of Pleadings; 4-24-13

Order Granting US’ Motion for Determiniation that the US’ Filing of Summary Judgment Pleadings is Timely, or in the Alternative, Allowing the Late Filing of Pleadings; 4-25-13

Statement of Undisputed Material Facts in Support of United States Motion for Summary Judgment; 4-24-13

United States Motion for Summary Judgment; 4-24-13

City of Las Cruces’ Rebuttal Witness List; 4-22-15

New Mexico Pecan Growers’ Trial Witness List; 4-22-15

Southern Rio Grande Diversified Crop Farmers Association’s Trial Witness List; 4-22-15

United States’ Disclosure of Rebuttal Witness List; 4-22-15

Elephant Butte Irrigation District’s Witness List; 4-22-15

Mandate and Opinion; 4-13-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Designation of Fact Witnesses; 4-21-15

Notice of Non-Availability-Reckard; 4-17-14

Pre-1906 DocketingStatement; 4-7-14

SNMs Motion for Summary Judgment on the Amounts of Water and Priority Dates for the United States’ Rio Grande Project Right; 4-19-13

ORDER Regarding Motion of EPCWID No. 1 to Make Filing in Stream System Issue 104; 4-13-12

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Withdrawal of Designation of Expert Witness; 4-10-15

US and EBID’s Joint Response to Pre-1906 Claimants Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SSI-97-104; 3-17-14

Pre-1906 Claimants’ and Boyd Interests Reply in Support of Their Motion to Stay Proceedings in SSI 104; 3-27-14

Motion for Extension of Time to File Summary Judgment Motions in Stream System Issue No. 104; 4-10-13

Boyd Estate, et al as Pre-1906 Claimants’ Comment to the State Engineer and the US’ Proposal for the Threshold Issues for Project Water Rights; 3-30-12

ORDER – Setting Briefing Schedule for Dispositive Motions Regarding the Source or Sources of Water for the US Rio Grande Project; 4-13-12

ORDER GRANTING THE US MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS; 4-10-13

Verde’s Comments on the US’ and SNM’s Separate Reports Regarding SSI 97-104; 3-30-12

City of El Pasos and Amicus Comments re: Statements of Issue; 3-30-12

NMSU Comment RE State and US Proposals filed March 16, 2012; 3-30-12

Motion to Lift Stay of Consideration of Amicus Curiae Brief and For Permission to File Amended Amicus Curiae Brief to Address Newly Designated Stream System Issue SS-97-104 (Lion’s Gate Water); 3-22-10

SRGDCFAs Comments Regarding the US and SNMs Statements of Issues Pertaining to the US’ Claims to Groundwater (objections Nos. 5&8); 3-30-12

City of Las Cruces’ Comments in Support of State Engineer’s REport to the Court and Proposed Scheduling Order; 3-30-12

EBID’S Comments Re the US’ Proposal for Threshold Issue; 3-30-12

El Paso Natural Gas Companys Comment Re New Mexico’s and US’ Statements of Issues Filed March 16, 2012; 3-30-12

NMPG’s Comments RE the US’ and the SNM’s Statements of Issues Pertaining to the US’ Claims to Groundwater (objections 5 & 8); 3-30-12

Notice of Non-Availability – Tessa T. Davidson; 3-25-15

Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension of time to submit Trial Witness Lists, Expert Rebuttal Reports and to Disclose Rebuttal Witness Lists; 3-6-15

SNMs Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SSI-97-104; 3-17-14

Notice of Completion of Briefing (Motion to Stay); 3-28-14

Request for Setting (Motion to Stay Further Proceedings); 3-28-14

Notice of Comment Period; 3-20-12

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel (Dempsey); 3-3-15

SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING PRIORITY DATE PROCEEDINGS; 3-13-14

US’ Proposal for Threshold Issue, RE: State’s Subfile Offer of Judgment to Settle the USA’s Rio Grande Project Rights; 3-16-12

Notice of Non-Availability – Robert Simon; 3-17-16

Notice of Appeal (Pre-1906 Claimants); 3-12-14

SNMs Separate Report on the Status of the Statement of Issues Pertaining to the US Claims’ to Groundwater (Objection Nos. 5&8); 3-16-12

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel-Dempsey; 3-11-16

Amended Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan; 2-27-15

Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Trial Witness Lists, Expert Rebuttal Reports and to Disclose Rebuttal Witness Lists; 3-4-15

Notice of Non-Availability (Simon); 3-9-15

Tentative Outline for SS-97-104 Priority Date Schedule (submitted by OSE on 2-28-14); 3-3-14

SNM and City of Las Cruces’ Joint Reply to SRGDCFA and NMPG’s and Individual Pecan Growers’ Responses to US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Right; 2-16-12

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Threshold Issue (26 pgs); 2-18-15

Notice of Hearing (Amended) – Set for March 7, 2014 @ 10:30 a.m.; 2-26-14

Letter RE: Tentative Priority Date Schedule; (submitted by OSE on Court 2-28-14); 3-3-14

Pre-1906 Claimants Motion to Stay Further Proceedings in SSI-97-104; 2-28-14

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion for Application of Judicial Estoppel; 2-18-15

Certificate of Service; 2-20-15

ORDER (1) GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING THE AMOUNTS OF WATER; (2) DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING PRIORITY DATE; (3) DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT TO THE PRE-1906 CLAIMANTS; and (4) SETTING A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; 2-17-14

Joint Reply of SNM and City of Las Cruces to City of El Paso’s Disputed Issues of Fact and Law re: US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment; 2-16-12

Notice of Deposition Duces Tecum to Andrew H. Gahan; 2-20-15

Boyd Estate, et al., as Pre-1906 Claimants Reply to the State Engineer, et al., Responses to US Claim for Project Rights; 2-16-12

US’ Consolidated Reply to Responses, RE: Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 2-16-12

EBIDs Notice of Unavailability; 2-4-14

EBID-Notice of Unavailability; 2-18-13

Notice of Deposition Decus Tecum to Neal W. Ackerly, PhD.; 2-3-15

EBIDs Reply to All Responses Filed 1-20-12 regarding Statements of Issues to be Litigated in above Captioned Stream System Issue; 2-16-12

NMSU’ Reply to Responses of United States and Other Participating Parties; 2-16-12

SNM’s Reply to Verde’s Response and City of Las Cruces’ Reply to the US’ Response to the State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the USA’s Rio Grande Project Rights; 2-16-12

2-16-12 – SNM, City of Las Cruces and Verde’s General Reply to the US’ Response to the State’s Offer of Judgment and the Responses of Participating Parties

Status Hearing-Set for March 7, 2014 @ 9:00 am; 2-6-14

EPCWIDs Reply in Support of Motion to Make Filings in Stream System Issue 104; 2-10-12

SNM and City of Las Cruces’ Joint Reply to The Boyd Estate, James Scott Boyd, Sammie Singh, Jr., and John Fleming as Pre-1906 Claimant’s Response to the United States’ Response to the State Engineer’s Offer of Judgment to the U.S. for Project Rights; 2-16-12

Certificate of Service; 1-29-15

Notice of Interim Pre-Trial Conference; 1-29-15

Notice of Non-Availability-Simon; 1-30-14

SRGDCFAs Response to El Paso County Water Improvement Districts Motion to Make Filings in Stream System Issue No. 104; 1-30-12

US Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Responses Regarding States Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-31-12

EPNG Notice of Joinder in NMSU’s Reply to Responses of US and Other Participating Parties; 2-16-12

NMPGs Reply to Parties Responses to the US Response to States Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rights in the Rio Grande Project; 2-16-12

ORDER ON US MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO REPLY TO RESPONSES REGARDING STATE’S OFFER OF JUDGMENT TO SETTLE THE US’ RIO GRANDE PROJECT WATER RIGHTS; 2-6-12

Entry of Appearance – Lisa J. Henne OBO EBID; 1-27-15

Certificate of Service of State’s Second Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production to Defendant United States; 1-28-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ First Amended Expert Witness List; 1-28-15

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Second Amended Expert Witness List; 1-29-15

State of New Mexico’s Comments on the Listed Disputed Material Facts and Issues of Law Enumerated in the United States’ Response to the State’s Offer of Judgment; 1-20-12

The Boyd Estate, et. al., as Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to the US’ Response to the State Engineer’s Offer of Judgment to the US for Project Rights; 1-20-12

Verde’s Response to US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the United States’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-20-12

NMPG’s and Individual Pecan Growers’ Response to US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-23-12

Joint Response of the SNM and the City of Las Cruces in Opposition to EPCWIDs Motion to Make Filing; 1-27-12

Statement Concerning Prioritization of Stream System Issues; 1-29-10

Boyd – Additional Exhibits to the US Response to States Offer of Judgment; 1-20-12

EBID’s Response to US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-20-12

Response of El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 to US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-20-12

Receipt for Exhibits; 1-19-16

El Paso County Water Improvement Districts Motion to Make Filings in Stream System Issue 104; 1-17-12

Boyd – Exhibits to the US Response to States Offer of Judgment to the US for Project Rights; 1-20-12

City of Las Cruces’ Reply to the US’ Response to State of New Mexico’s Offer of Judgment on United States’ Water Rights; 1-20-12

EBIDs Response to EPCWID Motion to Make Filings in Stream System Issue 104; 1-20-12

NMPG’s and Indiviidual Pecan Growers’ Response to United States’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle US’ Rio GRande Project Water Rights; 1-20-12

City of El Paso’s Disputed Issues of Fact and Law RE: US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment; 1-20-12

SRGDCFA’s Reply to the US’ Response to State’s Offer of Judgment to Settle the US’ Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-19-12

Certificate of Service-EBID’s Expert Report prepared by Dr. Neal Ackerly; 1-12-15

Certificate of Service-City of Las Cruces’ Statement of Opinions of Eluid L. Martinez; 1-12-15

State of New Mexico’s Response in Opposition to Amended Motion to Extend Time for Filing Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert’s Report; 1-8-15

Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time Until January 12, 2015 to File Expert Reports; 1-9-15

Order Setting a Deadline for the Filing of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; 1-5-16

Amended Motion to Extend Time for Filing Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert’s Report; 1-8-15

Motion to Extend Time for Filing Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert’s Report; 1-8-15

US Response to States Offer of Judgment to Settle the US Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 1-5-12

Notice of Judge Reassignment (Partial); 12-13-10

City of Las Cruces Amended Response to Motion for Order Lifting Stay; 12-16-10

SNMs Response to Various Movants Motion for Order Lifting Stay; 12-15-10

Notice of Non-Availability (Simon 11-22 through 12-4); 11-5-14

Proposed Order (1) Granting Summary Judgment Regarding the Amounts of Water; (2) Denying Summary Judgment Regarding Priority Date; (3) Denying Summary Judgment to the Pre-1906 Claimants; and (4) Setting A Scheduling Conference; 12-11-13

United States’ Motion for Extension of Time; 12-17-13

Order Designating Stream System Issue/Expedited Inter Se Proceeding No. 104, The United States Interests in the Stream System; 1-8-10

Reply to Responses to Motion for Order Lifting Stay (Boyd); 12-21-10

ORDER Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Expedited Inter Se Proceeding Pending a Tenth Circuit Decision in James Scott Boyd, et al V. United States, et al, Case No. 15-002; 12-8-15

City of Las Cruces Response to Motion for Order Lifting Stay; 12-15-10

Response of US, EBID, EPCWID #1 to Motion for Order Lifting Stay; 12-15-10

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Sammie Singh, Sr., et.al., Supplemental Exhibits to their Reply in Support Motion for Summary Judgment; 12-7-12

US’ Reply to Responses to Motion to Continue the Stay of Proceedings in Stream System Issue No. 104; 11-8-11

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CONTINUE STAY and SETTING INITIAL SCHEDULE OF PROCEEDINGS IN SSI No. 104; 11-29-11

SNMs Reply to Boyds Response to the US Motion to Stay Stream System Issue No. 104; 11-8-11

Notice of Supreme Court’s Order Appointing Special Master in No. 141, Orig., Texas v New Mexico et al; 11-6-14

Statement of Rights and Interests of Pre-1906 Water and Project Rights in SS-104 filed on behalf of the Estate of Dr. Nathan Boyd, et.al; 12-1-10

Certificate of Service (Pre1906 Claimants’ Responses to SNM’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production); 11-3-14

September 2016 Monthly Adjudication Report; 10-6-16

US, EBID, NMPG and SRGDCGA’s Post-Trial Brief

City of Las Cruces’ Post-Trial Brief in Support of 1906, 1908, and 1939 Priority Dates for the Rio Grande Project and Request for Oral Argument

US, EBID, NMPG, SRGDCGA’ Joint Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

State of New Mexico’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

City of El Paso and EPCWID1’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Relating to a Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project Right of the United States

City of EL Paso and EPCWID1’s Brief in Support of Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Relating to a Priority Date for the Rio Grande Project Right of the Unit

City of Las Cruces’ Requested Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

SNM’ Request for Oral Argument and Post-Trial Memorandum in Support of 1906, 1908 and 1939 as Priority Dates for the United States’ Rio Grande Project Right

Certificate of Service – Renewed Joint Mtn Stay

Joint Motion to Set Oral Argument

Renewed Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Brief in Support

EBID’s Response in Opposition to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedig in SSI-104

Receipt for Exhibits

United States’ Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceeding in SSI-104

City of Las Cruces’ Response to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceedings in SSI-104

Order Denying Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Stay Expedited Inter Se Proceeding Pending a Tenth Circuit Decision in James Scott Boyd, et al V. United States, et al, Case No. 15-002

SNM’s Response in Opposition to the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceeding in SSI-104

The Pre-1906 Claimants’ Renewed Motion to Stay Proceeding in SSI-104

Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conference and Status Conferences

Notice of Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals’ Order and Judgment Affirming District Court’s Denial of Appellants’ Motions to Intervene and Lift Stay

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel – Rebecca Dempsey

Notice of Unavailability of Counsel

New Mexico State University’s Expert Witness List

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Expert Witness List

City of Las Cruces’ Rebuttal Witness List

Clarified Objections of the SNM and the CLC to the Proposed Exhibit and Witness Lists of the Participating Parties in SSI 104, United States Priority Date

EBID’s Disclosure and Identification of Expert Witness

NMPG’s Supplemental Final Trial and Demonstrative Exhibits List

Objections of the SNM and the CLC to the Proposed Exhibit and Witness Lists of the Participating Parties in SSI 104, US Priority Date

Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Trial Witness Lists, Expert Rebuttal Reports and to Disclose Rebuttal Witness Lists

Pre-1906 Claimants’ Designation of Fact Witnesses

Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time Until January 12, 2015 to File Expert Reports

United States’ Objections to the SNM, CLC, and Pre-1906 Claimants’ Exhibit Lists and Expert Reports

EBID’s Final Trial Exhibit and Demonstrative Exhibit List