November2015
December2015
April2015
January2015
February2015
March2015
May2015
June2015
July2015
September2015
October2015
January2014
February Supplement2014
February2014
March2014
April2014
May2014
June2014
July2014
August2014
September2014
September Supplement2014
October2014
November2014
December Amended2014
December2014
OctoberCP
SeptemberCP
AprilCP
MarchCP
MayCP
AugustCP
DecemberCP
FebruaryCP
JanuaryCP
JulyCP
JuneCP
NovemberCP
Formulario B-101 – Notificación de participar (SS-97-101)
Aviso a los reclamantes de derechos de agua que reciben una oferta de fallo/orden provisional estipulada del estado
Formulario D – Notificación de cambio de domicilio o número telefónico
Formulario C – Objeción/respuesta a la oferta de adjudicación del estado
Formulario B-3126, 2237 y 2236 – Notificación de participar (OA-97-3126, 2237 y 2236; NM Copper, Harris Gray y William J. Frost)
Formulario B-104 – Notificación de participar (SS-97-104)
Formulario B-103 – Notificación de participar (SS-97-103)
Formulario B-102 – Notificación de participar (SS-97-102)
Formulario A – Respuesta a querella general de adjudicación
Formulario E – Aviso de transferencia de derecho de propiedad
Formulario B-107 – Notificación de participar (SS-97-107)
Form C – Objection/Response to State’s Offer of JudgmentCP
Form B – 104 – Notice of Intent to Participate (SS-97-104 – United States Interest)CP
Form B – 101 – Notice of Intent to Participate (SS-97-101 – FDR/CIR)CP
Notice to Water Rights Claimants Receiving an Offer of Judgment/Stipulated Subfile Order from the StateCP
Form B – Pre-1906 Claimants Inter Se Proceeding – Notice of Intent to ParticipateCP
Form B – LRO-28-008-9009/9010 – Notice of Intent to Participate (NM Copper, Frost and Gray)CP
Form B – 2413 – Notice of Intent to Participate (RN-97-2413 – Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd)CP
Form B – 103 – Notice of Intent to Participate (SS-97-103 – EBID Groundwater Claim)CP
Form B – 102 – Notice of Intent to Participate (SS-97-102 – EBID Underground Water Claim)CP
Form A – Answer to General Adjudication ComplaintCP
Quinta Orden Modificada Respecto de Procesos de Adjudicación de Aguas FluvialesCP
Primera Orden Modificada de Gestión de Casos Sobre Temas en el Sistema Fluvial Y DiligenciasCP
ORDEN DE GESTIÓN PROCESAL AUTORIZANDO LA NOTIFICACION MEDIANTE UN REPORTE MENSUALCP
Fifth Amended Order Regarding Stream Adjudication ProceduresCP
Fourth Amended Order Regarding Stream Adjudication Procedures, Revised Oct 16, 2007CP
Sixth Amended Order Regarding Stream Adjudication ProceduresCP
E-FILING NOTICECP
2nd Amended Case Management OrderCP
First Amended Case Management OrderCP
Order for Hydrology CommitteeCP
Case Management Order Authorizing Notice by a Monthly ReportCP
Amended Notice Concerning Electronic E-Filing in the Lower Rio GrandeCP
Seventh Amended Order Regarding Stream Adjudication ProceduresCP
Notice of Filing of State’s FY2017 Rule 1-071.3(B) Report; 9-28-16
Notice of and Invitation to Attend Joint Working Session New Mexico State Stream Adjudications Scheduled for October 6, 2016 at 9:30 a.m.; 9-19-16
Notice of Hearing, Scheduling Conference and Status Conferences; 9-13-16
Order for Electronic Record in the Lower Rio Grande Adjudication; 9-9-16
August 2016 Monthly Adjudication Report; 9-8-16
Notice of Status Conference – setting matter for 8-31-16 at 2:30 p.m.; 8-4-16
Reporte Sobre el Estado de la Adjudicación por el Estado de Nuevo México Para la Conferencia de Estado del 31 de Agosto de 2016; 8-23-16
State of New Mexico’s Status Report for the August 31, 2016 Status Conference; 8-23-16
State’s Mediation Report for the Status Conference August 31, 2016; 8-23-16
Informe 8-23-16
July 2016 Monthly Adjudication Report; 8-4-16
Order Regarding Surface Water Priority Dates Pending Resolution of Stream System Issue 104; 7-27-16
Amended Notice of Motion Hearing, setting matter for June 22, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.; 6-7-16
Pre-1906 Claimants’ Reply to EPCWID #1’s Response to EBID and OSE Motions to Designate Stream System Issues; 5-23-16
Reply of the SNM to Responses to its Motion to Designate the Status of Pre-Rio Grande Project Surface Water Rights as a Stream System Issue; 5-23-16
Reply to State of New Mexico’s Motion to Designate Mandamus Relief Regarding the Status of Pre-Rio Grande Project Surface Water Rights as a Stream System Issue; 5-23-16
EBID’s Reply to Responses of (1) SNM, (2) CLC, (3) NMPG, and (4) Pre-1906 Claimants to Motion for Designation of Stream System Issue for Pre-Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 5-23-16
Order Setting Time to Reply to EPCWID#1’s Response as Amicus Curiae to Motions to Designate Stream System Issues; 5-13-16
Response of CLC to EBID’s Motion for Designation of SSI for Pre-Rio Grande Project Water Rights and to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motions to Designate SSI and Concurrence in SNM Response to Same; 4-18-16
El Paso County Water Improvement District No.1’s Response as Amicus Curiae to Motions to Designate Stream System Issues; 4-29-16
Notice of Motion Hearing – setting matter for June 22, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.; 4-25-16
City of El Paso’s Response to Motions to Designate Stream System Issues for Pre-Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 4-18-16
City of Las Cruces’ Concurrence with the Response in Opposition of the SNM to Motion to Designate Mandamus Relief Regarding the Status of Pre-Rio Grande Project Surface Water Rights as a Stream System Issue; 4-18-16
EBID’s Response to (1) Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Set Stream System Issue regarding U.S. Claims to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Property Rights and (2) Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Set Stream System Issue regarding whether U.S. Coerced Farmers into Signing Assignments of their Project, Storage, and Diversion Works and Water Rights Against Their Free Will; 4-18-16
EBID’s Response to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Set Stream System Issue for Templeton Doctrine Ground Water Rights; 4-18-16
EBID’s Response to the SNM’ Motion to Designate the Status of Pre-Rio Grande Surface Water Rights as a Stream System Issue; 4-18-16
EPCWID #1’s Motion for Leave to File Response as Amicus Curiae to Motions to Designate Stream System Issues; 4-18-16
NMPG’s Response to Motions for Designation of Stream System Issues for Pre-Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 4-18-16
Pre-1906 Claimants’ Response to OSE’s, EBID’s, and Miller’s Proposed Stream Issues; 4-18-16
Response of the SNM to EBID’s Motion for Designation of Stream System Issue for Pre-Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 4-18-16
Response of the SRGDCFA to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Set Stream System Issue for Templeton Doctrine, Where the Pre-1906 Claimants’ Rights are Separate from any US Claim and Regarding US Claims to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Property Rights; 4-18-16
Response of the State of New Mexico to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motions to Designate Stream System Issues; 4-18-16
Response to Motions to Designate a Stream System Issue Related to Pre-Rio Grande Project Surface Water Rights (FILED BY U.S.); 4-18-16
SRGDCFA Response in Support of EBID’s Motion for Designation of Stream System Issue for Pre-Rio Grande Project Water Rights and SNM’s Motion to Designate the Status of Pre-Rio Grande Project Surface Water Rights as a SSI; 4-18-16
EBID’s Response to (1) Pre-1906 Claimants’ Mtn Set SSI Regarding Whether Farmers Lacked Title in 1905 Sufficient to Assign any Diversion or Storage Project Rights to the US, and (2) Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Set Stream System Issue Regarding Whether Pre-1906 Claimant’s Rights are Separate from any U.S. Claim; 4-18-16
EBID’s Response to Miller Farms Parties’ Motion to Designate Mandamus Relief Regarding the Status of Pre-Rio Grande Project Surface Water Rights as a Stream System Issue; 4-18-16
EBID’s Response to Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Set Stream System Issue Regarding Whether Rented State Land on Which Water is used Should be Administered Under State Laws; 4-18-16
Response in Opposition of the SNM to Motion to Designate Mandamus Relief Regarding the Status of Pre-Rio Grande Project Surface Water Rights as a Stream System Issue; 4-18-16
Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Set Stream System Issue for Templeton Doctrine Ground Water Rights; 3-31-16
Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Set Stream System Issue for Templeton Doctrine Ground Water Rights; 3-31-16
Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Set Stream System Issue Regarding Whether Rented State Land on Which Water is Used Should be Administered Under State Laws; 3-31-16
Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Set Stream System Issue Regarding Whether the U.S. Coerced Farmers into Signing Assignments of their Project, Storage, and Diversion Works and Water Rights Against their Free Will; 3-31-16
Pre-1906 Claimants’ Motion to Set Stream System Issue Regarding Whether the Farmers Lacked Title in 1905 Sufficient to Assign any Diversion or Storage Project Rights to the U.S.; 3-31-16
EBID’s Motion for Designation of Stream System Issue for Pre-Rio Grande Project Water Rights; 3-28-16
Motion to Designate Mandamus Relief Regarding the Status of Pre-Rio Grande Project Surface Water Rights as a Stream System Issue; 3-28-16
Motion to Designate the Status of Pre-Rio Grande Project Surface Water Rights as a Stream System Issue; 3-28-16
Correspondence from OSE – Proceeding on Pre-Project Rights in the LRG; 3-16-16
Correspondence from Honorable James J. Wechsler; 2-22-16
Notice of Telephonic Hearing set for 2-15-16; 2-10-16
Mandate and Opinion from COA- Filed 6-19-2015
Pre-filled forms for Doña Ana County
Mandate and Opinion of the Court of Appeals; 6-19-15nb
Order on Motion for Rehearing- Filed 11-17-2014
Pre-filled forms for Doña Ana County
Order on Motion for Rehearing (motion for rehearing denied); 11-17-14;nb
Motion for Permission to Exceed Page Limits in Reply Brief; filed 7-11-13nb
Amended Motion for Permission to Exceed Page Limits in Reply Brief; filed 7-11-13nb
Motion for Leave to Extend Time for Filing Reply Brief; filed 6-24-13nb
Corrected Motion for Leave t Exceed Page or Word Limitation of Brief and to Extend Time for Filing Brief; filed 3-14-13nb
Motion for Leave to Exceed Page or Word Limitation of Brief and to Extend Time for Filing Brief; filed 3-13-13nb
Transmittal Letter; filed 1-23-13nb
Certificate of Mailing; filed 1-23-13nb
Notice of Filing Transcript on Appeal; filed 1-7-13nb
Certificate of Satisfactory Arrangement-Rubino; filed 12-18-12nb
Certificate of Satisfactory Arrangement-DiGregorio; filed 12-18-12nb
Designation of Transcript of Proceedings on Appeal; filed 11-20-12nb
Notice of Nondesignation of Transcript; filed 11-7-12nb
Third Motion to Amend Record Proper; filed 11-7-12nb
Motion and ORDER on Second Motion to Amend the Record Proper; filed 10-15-12nb
Notice of Assignment to the General Calendar; 9-21-12;nb
Transmittal Letter; filed 7-6-12nb
Clerk’s Certificate; filed 7-6-12nb
Certificate of Costs; 7-6-12;nb
Docketing Statement (COA filed on 5-14-12); 7-5-12;nb
Notice of Withdrawal of Attorney for EBID-Beverly J. Singleman; filed 5-31-12nb
Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration; 4-20-12;nb
Order Denying EBID’s Motion to Strike and for Attorney Fees; 4-13-12;nb
Notice of Appeal; 4-6-12;nb
EBID’s Response and Motion to Strike Boyd Estate’s Motion to Reconsider the Court’s 2-14-12 Order Granting the US’, EBID’s and the City of Las Cruces’ Motions to Dismiss the Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd and for Attorney Fees; 3-13-12;nb
Motion Reconsider the Order Dated 2-24-12 Granting the US, OSE, EBID and City of Las Cruces’ Motions to Dismiss Estate of Nathan Boyd; 3-6-12;nb
Order Granting (1) the US’ and EBID’s and (2) The City of Las Cruces’ Motons to Dismiss the Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd; 2-24-12nb
Movant Boyd’s Reply to the US, EBID and Las Cruces’ Response in Support of His Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 10-26-11;nb
Boyd’s Motion for an Extension of Time to file a Reply to the US, EBID and Las Cruces’ Response to Boyd’s Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 10-26-11;nb
City of Las Cruces’ Response to Boyd Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 9-10-11;nb
City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Leave to File a Response to Boyd Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 9-20-11;nb
Notice of Errata for US’ and EBID’s Reply to the Boyd Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 9-14-11;nb
US’ and EBID’s Reply to the Boyd Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 9-12-11;nb
Order Granting City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Leave to File Response to Boyd Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record and Further Granting Such Leave for Other Parties to this Proceeding; 9-22-11;nb
Motion for Leave to Clarify and Correct the Record; 8-26-11;nb
City of Las Cruces’ Reply to the Boyd Response to the Motion to Dismiss Submitted by the US, EBID, Las Cruces and the Responses of the State of New Mexico’s and NMSU’s EBID’s Support of the Motions to Dismiss; 8-01-11;nb
US’ and EBID’s Reply to the Boyd Response to Motions to Dismiss; 7-25-11;nb
Notice of Errata to Boyd’s Response to the US, EBID, Las Cruce’s Motions to Dismiss, and the SNM & NMSU’s Response in Support of US and EBID’s Motion; 7-22-11;nb
Order Granting City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Extension of Time to Reply to Boyd Response to the Motion to Dimiss Submitted by the US, EBID, Las Cruces and the Responses of the SNM’s & NMSU, EBID’s Support of the Motions for to Dimiss; 7-21-11;nb
City of Las Cruces’ Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Boyd Response to the Motion to Dismiss Submitted by the US, EBID, Las Cruces and the Responses of the SNM & NMSU’s EBID’s Support of the Motions to Dismiss; 7-18-11;nb
Boyd Response to the Motion to Dismiss Submitted by the US, EBID, Las Cruces and the Responses of the State of New Mexico’s & NMSU’s, EBID’s Support of the Motions to Dismiss; 7-14-11;nb
NMSU’s Response in Support of Motions to Dismiss filed by the US, EBID and City of Las Cruces; 7-8-11;nb
State’s Response to Motions to Dismiss by US and City of Las Cruces; 6-15-11;nb
City of Las Cruces Motion to Dismiss Boyd Claims; 5-27-11;nb
Brief in Support of Las Cruces’ Motion to Dismiss Boyd Claims; 5-27-11;nb
Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Statement of Claim of hte Estate of Nathan Boyd (US and EBID); 5-27-11nb
Motion to Dismiss (US and EBID); 5-27-11;nb
Scheding Order for Pretrial Motions Regarding Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd; 4-13-11;nb
Consolidated Proposed Scheduling Report; 3-18-11;nb
Statement of Claims by Nathan E. Boyd Estate Pursuant to the Order Commencing Expedited Inter Se Proceeding to Determine the Claims of the Estate of Nathan Boyd Filed February 4, 2011- Filed 3-4-2011
Pre-filled forms for Doña Ana County